Darius Knowledge Hub

Constrained Decoding

5 min read

Constrained Decoding

Created: =dateformat(this.file.ctime,"dd MMM yyyy, hh:mm a") | Modified: =dateformat(this.file.mtime,"dd MMM yyyy, hh:mm a") Tags: knowledge

Overview

Introduction

Constrained Decoding enables reliable function calling / tool calling for LLMs, see Structured model outputs | OpenAI API.

Constrained decoding alters the model’s token-selection process so that, at each step, only valid tokens are allowed. This might be as simple as supplying a list of allowed tokens—or as sophisticated as embedding a formal grammar and using a state machine to filter out invalid tokens.

The drawback of constrained decoding is that extra latency is needed to enforce these constraints—often a few milliseconds per token. This is because the model may need to backtrack repeatedly, navigate the pruned vocabulary, and ultimately generate a valid token. Backtracking happens inside the LLM’s generation loop. As such, debugging, profiling, and tuning constrained decoding can be difficult without fine-grained telemetry in the model itself.

Another performance consideration is cache efficiency. Pruning the full probability distribution at every decode step can blow caches and reduce throughput even further. This is particularly noticeable when the allowed token set is heavily limited.

To mitigate these costs, many frameworks compile a JSON grammar and precompute valid tokens for each state. This allows the inference engine to mask out invalid softmax outputs at runtime. This approach reduces backtracking, improves caching, and raises acceptance rates.

Part 1: Overview of Constrained Decoding

Constrained Decoding, also known as Structured Output Generation, refers to the technique of forcing a Large Language Model (LLM) to generate output that adheres to a specific formal structure (such as JSON, SQL, Python, or a Regex pattern) rather than free-form natural language.

While LLMs are excellent at probabilistic text generation, they are not inherently deterministic regarding syntax. Without constraints, a model might generate valid JSON 99% of the time, but occasionally miss a closing brace } or insert a string where an integer is required, breaking downstream applications.

The Core Mechanism: Logit Masking

In standard decoding, the model computes a probability distribution over the entire vocabulary ( V ) for the next token ( x_t ), given the context ( x_{<t} ):

Where ( z_t ) are the logits.

In Constrained Decoding, an external guide (usually a Finite State Machine or a Parser) analyzes the partial generation so far. It determines which tokens in the vocabulary are valid continuations according to the schema.

  1. A mask ( M ) is created where valid tokens have ( 0 ) and invalid tokens have ( -\infty ).
  2. The logits are modified before the softmax step:

This mathematically guarantees that the model cannot sample a token that violates the structural constraints.

Key Challenges

  1. Latency: computing the mask for the entire vocabulary (often 32k–128k tokens) at every step can be computationally expensive.
  2. Tokenization Alignment: Regex or Grammar rules operate on characters, but LLMs operate on tokens. A single token might contain multiple characters that bridge a structural boundary (e.g., a token containing ": " in JSON).

Part 2: Strong Baseline Methods & Libraries

The landscape is divided into Inference Engines (low-level, high-performance) and Orchestration Libraries (developer-friendly abstractions).

1. High-Performance Inference Engines (The “Backend”)

These are the strongest baselines for production deployment. They implement constrained decoding directly in C++/CUDA or optimized Python.

  • vLLM (with XGrammar / Outlines integration): vLLM is currently the industry standard for open-source high-throughput serving. It recently integrated optimization techniques that process Context-Free Grammars (CFGs) and Regex constraints efficiently during the inference pass with minimal overhead.

  • SGLang (Structured Generation Language): Developed by the team at UC Berkeley (LMSYS), SGLang is designed specifically for this task. It introduces RadixAttention, which caches the KV-blocks of the constraints. This makes it significantly faster than standard decoding when generating structured data because the “structure” (keys, braces) acts as a reusable prefix.

  • Llama.cpp (GGUF): The standard for local/edge inference. It includes a native “Grammar Sampling” implementation. It accepts GBNF (Grammar-Based Backus-Naur Form) files to constrain generation. This is a very strong baseline for CPU-based or edge-device constrained decoding.

2. Python Orchestration Libraries (The “Middleware”)

If you are using API providers (like OpenAI, Anthropic) or local models via HuggingFace transformers, these libraries handle the complexity for you.

  • Outlines: Currently considered the state-of-the-art Python library for constrained generation.

    • Method: It compiles Regex or JSON schemas into a Finite State Machine (FSM). It then creates an index mapping FSM states to valid vocabulary tokens. This allows for near-zero latency overhead during generation.
    • Use case: Local models (HuggingFace) and vLLM integration.

  • Guidance (by Microsoft): A guidance language that allows you to interleave generation, prompting, and logical control flow.

    • Method: It enforces constraints by strictly controlling the generation loop. It is highly optimized for “fill-in-the-middle” structure.
    • Use case: Complex prompt engineering where structure and logic are intertwined.

  • Instructor: The most popular library for API-based structured output.

    • Method: It does not usually perform logit masking (as APIs often don’t expose logits). Instead, it wraps Python Pydantic models and manages the “retry” loop or specific API parameters (like OpenAI’s response_format) to ensure the output matches the Pydantic schema.
    • Use case: Using commercial APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic) while maintaining type safety in Python.

  • LMQL (Language Model Query Language): A programming language for LLM interaction.

    • Method: It restricts the search space of the model during decoding. It can enforce constraints that go beyond simple syntax, such as high-level logical constraints.

Benchmarking (How to Measure SOTA)

To evaluate these methods effectively, you should look at the current industry standard benchmark:

  • JSONSchemaBench (2025)
    • This is the newly established benchmark for measuring constrained decoding. It evaluates frameworks (like Guidance, Outlines, XGrammar) across three axes:
      1. Reliability: Does it actually output valid JSON? (Many older methods fail on edge cases).
      2. Latency: Time-to-first-token and total generation time.
      3. Quality: Does the constraint lower the intelligence of the response?

References

Graph View